【禁闻】温州南站电务段发公开信 喊冤

【禁闻】温州南站电务段发公开信 喊冤

【新唐人2011年9月1日讯】中共当局对�7．23�温州动车追尾事故调查结果即将公布
前，发生了一件�微妙�的事情。署名为�杭州电务段温州车间全体职工�的一封公开
信，在内地各大论坛被转载，信中反驳国家安监总局总工程师、新闻发言人黄毅关于�
7.23�温州动车追尾事故原因的讲话。

8月30号的《东方网》报导说，温州南站电务车间全体员工8月26号晚对外发布了一封公
开信，反驳国家安监总局总工程师、新闻发言人黄毅关于温州动车追尾事故原因的讲
话，认为他的讲话�与事实不符、混淆职责、有失公正�。信中还提到，�7.23�事故
当天值班的两位职工到目前为止仍然被扣留。

8月23号，黄毅在接受《中国新闻周刊》采访时说，从发生故障到列车追尾，责任部门
没有采取防范措施，违规操作；黄毅还提到：温州南站电务值班人员没有按有关规定及
时汇报，没有进行故障处理，没能有效防止事故的发生。

公开信中逐条进行了反驳。例如：

�1、'未进行故障处理'与事实不符。当时电务值班人员正根据车务登记的2个轨道电路
区段故障进行故障处理。�

�2、汇报主要是车站值班员的职责，而电务值班人员应当在接收车站的故障通知
后，按照故障处理流程尽快修复设备。事实上当天车站值班员已经发现了CTC设备故
障，并向行车调度作了汇报，只是没有在运统-46上登记并通知电务值班人员。因
此，电务值班人员不存在�未按规定进行及时汇报�问题。

�3、当天的情况是车站和调度所的监控屏幕上都出现了D3115次丢车的显示，但CTC设
备系统没有�丢车报警功能�，车站值班员已经发现了�丢车�情况，并向行车调度作
了汇报。�

公开信除了反驳黄毅的讲话，还透露以前鲜为人知的�D3115次丢车�，�该系统没有
丢车报警功能�等信息。显示当时D3115次丢车虽然已经被调度确认，但由于系统功能
缺乏，无从处理。不过，调度员在收到�丢车报告�后为什么没有发出预警，以及是否
还有别的隐情等，则将引发新的问责。

�丢车�这一信息在各大论坛上引起网友的热烈议论，许多网友表示震惊。有网友指责
这体现了�铁道部的管理弱智，一定不能承认，找替罪羊是惯用的手法。�也有人讽刺
说：�安监局的报告已经避重就轻，帮领导开脱了，可惜下面的人不愿意帮领导背责
任，没有全局观。� 更有人叹息，�没有公正，没有真相，从上而下，彻底溃烂。�

公开信在网络引发讨论后，《每日经济新闻》31号的报导说，杭州电务段温州车间有关
负责人30号表示，虽然这一公开信的署名为�杭州电务段温州车间全体职工�，但写公
开信的可能是温州车间个别职工，或其他车间，不清楚是什么人所写。但他没有否认�
7．23�事故当天值班的两名职工到目前为止仍然被扣留。

公开信中也提到，�我们深感不安，甚至是恐惧。大家都害怕值班，害怕处理故障，大
家都对铁路信号工作失去了信心，深怕一不小心就会被追究法律责任。这是我们的悲
哀，也是所有电务职工的悲哀，也是�公道�的悲哀，更是社会法制的悲哀…。�

新唐人记者尚燕、柏妮综合报导。

Wenzhou South Train Station Electricity Department's Open Letter

Prior to the 'July 23 high-speed rail crash's result releasing,a 'delicate'
issue took place.An open letter claimed to be written by �All members of
staffin Wenzhou Railway Electricity Department�has been widely spread
online by netizens.It disputed the news spokesman and the state
administration'sbureau engineer Huang Yi about his remarksexplaining the
main cause of the rail incident.

The eastday.com said on August 30, that all staff members ofthe electricity
department in Wenzhou South Station jointlywrote an open letter, which was
made public on August 26to disprove news spokesman Huang Yi's speech.It
stated, �the staff members disagree with the content,which is biased and
obscure.� In the letter it is also stated thattwo staff on duty on the day
of accident are still detained.

Huang told China News on Aug. 23, responsible departmentsdidn't take
precautionary measures before the crash.He also blamed the staff of the
Electricity Department inWenzhou South Station for their delayed report,no
recovery process and ineffective prevention measures.

The letter refuted Yi's speech point by point:1. The � no recovery
processing� is a lie.The electricity department staff members on duty at
thattime were troubleshooting the two track circuits.2. Reporting is the
duty of the shift staff of the station.The electricity workshop staff
members are responsible forrepairing the equipment after receiving a fault
noticefrom the station.The fact is, the shift duty staff had already found
fault in theCTC equipment and reported this to the dispatching
department.They did not inform the electricity department staff on theYT-46
registration system.Hence, the electricity department staff members werenot
responsible for the delayed report.3. On the day of crash, the monitoring
screens at the stationand the dispatching department showed signs thatthe
D3115 train was missing, however, the CTC equipmentlacks an alarming
function for missing trains.Nevertheless, the shift station staff reported
the train missingsituation to the dispatching department.The open letter is
not only refuting Huang's speech,but provides more information.This
includes the unknown fact of the D3115 train missingand the lack of an
alarming function for missing trains.It shows that despite the train
missing message was confirmed,it was not dealt with, due to the system's
lack of functionality.As to the reason why the dispatchers did not make any
earlywarnings upon receiving the report,or if something had been hidden,
remain questionable.

The report of the missing train spurred massive disputes online,with some
citizens making condemning remarks:�They will never confess the managerial
stupidity in theMinistry of Railways, but they will try to find someone to
takethe blame for them.�Another satirized, �the safety supervision bureau
report hasalready helped the authorities to defuse the intense
critique,shamefully their subordinates didn't want to become scapegoats,�
Another said hopeless, �no justice, no truth on any managementlevel,
thoroughly corrupt.�The NBD News said on August 31 that the person in
charge ofthe Wenzhou electricity department stated, on August 30,even
though the open letter bears the signature of all staffmembers, it may have
been written by just a few people,or by staff from other departments. The
fact that two staffmembers on duty remain in detention is not denied.Also
contained in the letter, �we are worried and terrified.People here are
afraid to go on shift, or fault processing.Confidence has been lost in
railway signal duties,for fears of being charged with liability formaking
even a slight mistake. It is the sadness for all ourelectricity department
members, for social morals,and for social judicial judgment.�

NTD reporters Shang Yan and Bo Ni 2011-09-01
10:18:05http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/09/01/a582019.html.-【禁闻】温州南
站电务段发公开信-喊冤.html